Tang, Ya-Wen and Dutrey, Anne and Koch, Patrick M. and Guilloteau, Stephane and Yen, Hsi-Wei and di Folco, Emmanuel and Pantin, Eric and Muto, Takayuki and Kataoka, Akimasa and Brauer, Robert (2023) Polarization in the GG Tau Ring—Confronting Dust Self-scattering, Dust Mechanical and Magnetic Alignment, Spirals, and Dust Grain Drift. The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 947 (1). L5. ISSN 2041-8205
5.pdf - Published Version
Download (1MB)
Abstract
We report Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array (ALMA) polarization observations at 3 and 0.9 mm toward the GG Tau A system. In the ring, the percentage is relatively homogeneous at 3 mm, being 1.2%, while it exhibits a clear radial variation at 0.9 mm with a mean increasing from 0.6% to 2.8% toward larger radius (r). The polarization orientation at r > 1farcs85 appears nearly azimuthal at both wavelengths. At r < 1farcs85, the pattern remains azimuthal at 3 mm but becomes radial at 0.9 mm. The dust self-scattering model with ${a}_{\max }$ of 1 mm could reproduce the observed polarization orientation and percentage at 0.9 mm, but the expected polarization percentage at 3 mm would be 0.2%, much smaller than the detected 1.2%. Dust alignment with poloidal magnetic field could qualitatively reproduce the flip in polarization at r < 1farcs85 and also the detected polarization percentage. A closer inspection of the nearly azimuthal pattern reveals that polarization orientations are systematically deviating by −9fdg0 ± 1fdg2 from the tangent of the orbit ellipses. This deviation agrees with the direction of the spiral pattern observed in the near-infrared, but it is unclear how dust grains could be aligned along such spirals. For the scenario where the −9° deviation (−7fdg3 after considering the inclination effect) measures the radial component of the dust drift motion, the expected inward drifting velocity would be ∼12.8% of the Keplerian speed, a factor of 2.8 larger than the theoretical predictions. Possible additional interpretations of the polarization are discussed, but there is no single mechanism that could explain the detected polarization simultaneously.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Subjects: | GO for STM > Physics and Astronomy |
Depositing User: | Unnamed user with email support@goforstm.com |
Date Deposited: | 18 Apr 2023 06:01 |
Last Modified: | 31 Jan 2024 03:58 |
URI: | http://archive.article4submit.com/id/eprint/584 |