Assessing Vertical Accuracy and Spatial Coverage of ICESat-2 and GEDI Spaceborne Lidar for Creating Global Terrain Models

Pronk, Maarten and Eleveld, Marieke and Ledoux, Hugo (2024) Assessing Vertical Accuracy and Spatial Coverage of ICESat-2 and GEDI Spaceborne Lidar for Creating Global Terrain Models. Remote Sensing, 16 (13). p. 2259. ISSN 2072-4292

[thumbnail of remotesensing-16-02259.pdf] Text
remotesensing-16-02259.pdf - Published Version

Download (12MB)

Abstract

Digital Elevation Models (DEMs) are a necessity for modelling many large-scale environmental processes. In this study, we investigate the potential of data from two spaceborne lidar altimetry missions, ICESat-2 and GEDI—with respect to their vertical accuracies and planimetric data collection patterns—as sources for rasterisation towards creating global DEMs. We validate the terrain measurements of both missions against airborne lidar datasets over three areas in the Netherlands, Switzerland, and New Zealand and differentiate them using land-cover classes. For our experiments, we use five years of ICESat-2 ATL03 data and four years of GEDI L2A data for a total of 252 million measurements. The datasets are filtered using parameter flags provided by the higher-level products ICESat-2 ATL08 and GEDI L3A. For all areas and land-cover classes combined, ICESat-2 achieves a bias of -0.11m, an MAE of 0.43m, and an RMSE of 0.93m. From our experiments, we find that GEDI is less accurate, with a bias of 0.09m, an MAE of 0.98m, and an RMSE of 2.96m. Measurements in open land-cover classes, such as “Cropland” and “Grassland”, result in the best accuracy for both missions. We also find that the slope of the terrain has a major influence on vertical accuracy, more so for GEDI than ICESat-2 because of its larger horizontal geolocation error. In contrast, we find little effect of either beam power or background solar radiation, nor do we find noticeable seasonal effects on accuracy. Furthermore, we investigate the spatial coverage of ICESat-2 and GEDI by deriving a DEM at different horizontal resolutions and latitudes. GEDI has higher spatial coverage than ICESat-2 at lower latitudes due to its beam pattern and lower inclination angle, and a derived DEM can achieve a resolution of 500m. ICESat-2 only reaches a DEM resolution of 700m at the equator, but it increases to almost 200m at higher latitudes. When combined, a 500m resolution lidar-based DEM can be achieved globally. Our results indicate that both ICESat-2 and GEDI enable accurate terrain measurements anywhere in the world. Especially in data-poor areas—such as the tropics—this has potential for new applications and insights.

Item Type: Article
Subjects: GO for STM > Engineering
Depositing User: Unnamed user with email support@goforstm.com
Date Deposited: 22 Jun 2024 10:12
Last Modified: 22 Jun 2024 10:12
URI: http://archive.article4submit.com/id/eprint/2896

Actions (login required)

View Item
View Item